For today's blog posting I decided to check in with NASA's webpage http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/ . On the 10th anniversary of the launch of
NASA's Aura spacecraft, the webpage offers ten examples of how the satellite has
changed our view of dust, pollution, aerosols, and ozone in our
atmosphere.
The photo above was taken by the satellite showing the atmosphere above southwestern Asia. Cold winter weather and burgeoning industrial economies have made for
difficult breathing in Asia and the Middle East. News
reports from Tehran, Beijing, and other cities
have described hazy skies with very low visibility; restrictions on
driving, factory operations, and outdoor activity; and hospitals full of
people with lung ailments.
The map above shows the concentration of nitrogen dioxide in the atmosphere. Shades of orange reflect the relative abundance of the polluting gas. Nitrogen dioxide is a key emission from the burning of fossil fuels by
cars, trucks, power plants, and factories; the combustion of fuel also
produces sulfur dioxides and aerosol particles. When the weather is hot
and sunlight strongest, nitrogen dioxide emissions usually lead to the creation of ground-level ozone. In the winter, the gas
is less likely to breed ozone, but it does linger for a long time and
contribute to fine particle pollution. Year-round, it is a good proxy
for the presence of air pollution.
About a quarter-century ago, scientists and policymakers unveiled
what the United Nations calls “the most successful treaty in UN
history.” On September 16, 1987, the first 24 nations signed on to the
Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer; 173 more
have signed on in the years since. The international agreement likely
saved the world from an environmental crisis, while setting an example
for how to develop and implement environmental policy.
Prompted by scientific observations from the laboratory, the ground,
aircraft, and satellites, the Montreal Protocol first reduced and then
banned the chlorine- and bromine-based chemicals (particularly
chlorofluorocarbons, or CFCs) that destroy atmospheric ozone. The
destruction of the ozone layer allows more of the Sun’s ultraviolet
radiation to reach the surface of the planet, increasing the risk of
sunburns, skin cancer, and eye damage. The most prominent and infamous
sign of depletion is the annual “ozone hole” that forms around the South
Pole.
In 1979—when scientists were just coming to understand that
atmospheric ozone could be depleted—the area of ozone depletion over
Antarctica grew to 1.1 million square kilometers, with a minimum ozone
concentration of 194 Dobson Units. In 1987, as the Montreal Protocol was
being signed, the area of the hole reached 22.4 million square
kilometers and ozone concentrations dropped to 109 DU. By 2006, the
worst year for ozone depletion to date, the numbers were 29.6 million
square kilometers and just 84 DU. By 2011, the most recent year with a
complete data set, the hole stretched 26 million square kilometers and
dropped to 95 DU.
According to NASA scientist Pawan Bhartia, “The Antarctic hole is
stabilizing and may be slowly recovering. Our focus now is to make sure
that it is healing as expected.” The amount of ozone-depleting
substances (ODS) in the atmosphere has stopped rising in recent years,
and may actually be decreasing.
In 1998, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) called on 22 eastern states to develop plans to significantly reduce emissions of nitrogen oxides,
a group of highly reactive gases released by combustion engines,
electric power plants, and a range of industrial activities. In 2005, the EPA issued the Clean Air Interstate Rule, a regulation that encouraged states to use a cap-and-trade system to further reduce emissions of these polluting gases.
About a decade later, the effects of these federal and state efforts have left the air far cleaner than it was before. Total nitrogen oxide
emissions have fallen by 47 percent in the United States since the late
1990s. Emissions from electric power generation and highway vehicles,
the two largest sources, have decreased by 68 percent and 43 percent
respectively, according to EPA statistics. The declines are even large
enough to be seen from space. The measurements by NASA are depicted in the map above. The larger the yellow circle, the larger the decrease in polluting gases.
CITES:
Jesse Allen and Michael Carlowicz., using data provided courtesy of the Aura OMI science team.
Robert Simmon, using imagery from the Ozone Hole Watch. Caption by Mike Carlowicz.
Robert Simmon, using data from Duncan et al., 2013. Caption by Adam Voiland.
No comments:
Post a Comment